Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/dev' into refactor/zmq-internal-socket-behaviour

# Conflicts:
#	src/control_backend/agents/ri_command_agent.py
#	src/control_backend/agents/ri_communication_agent.py
#	src/control_backend/api/v1/endpoints/command.py
#	src/control_backend/main.py
#	test/integration/api/endpoints/test_command_endpoint.py
This commit is contained in:
Twirre Meulenbelt
2025-11-05 12:16:18 +01:00
30 changed files with 443 additions and 211 deletions

View File

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
import asyncio
import zmq
import json
import pytest
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
import pytest
import zmq
from control_backend.agents.ri_command_agent import RICommandAgent
from control_backend.schemas.ri_message import SpeechCommand
@pytest.fixture

View File

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
import asyncio
from unittest.mock import ANY, AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
import pytest
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch, ANY
from control_backend.agents.ri_communication_agent import RICommunicationAgent
@@ -177,8 +179,8 @@ async def test_setup_creates_socket_and_negotiate_3(zmq_context, caplog):
# Mock RICommandAgent agent startup
# We are sending wrong negotiation info to the communication agent, so we should retry and expect a
# better response, within a limited time.
# We are sending wrong negotiation info to the communication agent,
# so we should retry and expect a better response, within a limited time.
with patch(
"control_backend.agents.ri_communication_agent.RICommandAgent", autospec=True
) as MockCommandAgent:
@@ -330,8 +332,8 @@ async def test_setup_creates_socket_and_negotiate_7(zmq_context, caplog):
# Mock RICommandAgent agent startup
# We are sending wrong negotiation info to the communication agent, so we should retry and expect a
# better response, within a limited time.
# We are sending wrong negotiation info to the communication agent,
# so we should retry and expect a better response, within a limited time.
with patch(
"control_backend.agents.ri_communication_agent.RICommandAgent", autospec=True
) as MockCommandAgent:

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
from unittest.mock import MagicMock
import pytest
from fastapi import FastAPI
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ def app():
"""
app = FastAPI()
app.include_router(command.router)
app.state.internal_comm_socket = MagicMock() # mock ZMQ socket
return app
@@ -25,32 +26,32 @@ def client(app):
return TestClient(app)
@pytest.mark.asyncio
@patch("control_backend.api.v1.endpoints.command.Context.instance")
async def test_receive_command_success(mock_context_instance, client):
def test_receive_command_endpoint(client, app):
"""
Test for successful reception of a command.
Ensures the status code is 202 and the response body is correct.
It also verifies that the ZeroMQ socket's send_multipart method is called with the expected data.
Test that a POST to /command sends the right multipart message
and returns a 202 with the expected JSON body.
"""
# Arrange
mock_pub_socket = AsyncMock()
client.app.state.endpoints_pub_socket = mock_pub_socket
mock_socket = app.state.internal_comm_socket
command_data = {"endpoint": "actuate/speech", "data": "This is a test"}
speech_command = SpeechCommand(**command_data)
# Prepare test payload that matches SpeechCommand
payload = {"endpoint": "actuate/speech", "data": "yooo"}
# Act
response = client.post("/command", json=command_data)
# Send POST request
response = client.post("/command", json=payload)
# Assert
# Check response
assert response.status_code == 202
assert response.json() == {"status": "Command received"}
# Verify that the ZMQ socket was used correctly
mock_pub_socket.send_multipart.assert_awaited_once_with(
[b"command", speech_command.model_dump_json().encode()]
)
# Verify that the socket was called with the correct data
assert mock_socket.send_multipart.called, "Socket should be used to send data"
args, kwargs = mock_socket.send_multipart.call_args
sent_data = args[0]
assert sent_data[0] == b"command"
# Check JSON encoding roughly matches
assert isinstance(SpeechCommand.model_validate_json(sent_data[1].decode()), SpeechCommand)
def test_receive_command_invalid_payload(client):

View File

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
import pytest
from control_backend.schemas.ri_message import RIMessage, RIEndpoint, SpeechCommand
from pydantic import ValidationError
from control_backend.schemas.ri_message import RIEndpoint, RIMessage, SpeechCommand
def valid_command_1():
return SpeechCommand(data="Hallo?")
@@ -13,24 +14,13 @@ def invalid_command_1():
def test_valid_speech_command_1():
command = valid_command_1()
try:
RIMessage.model_validate(command)
SpeechCommand.model_validate(command)
assert True
except ValidationError:
assert False
RIMessage.model_validate(command)
SpeechCommand.model_validate(command)
def test_invalid_speech_command_1():
command = invalid_command_1()
passed_ri_message_validation = False
try:
# Should succeed, still.
RIMessage.model_validate(command)
passed_ri_message_validation = True
RIMessage.model_validate(command)
# Should fail.
with pytest.raises(ValidationError):
SpeechCommand.model_validate(command)
assert False
except ValidationError:
assert passed_ri_message_validation